Trains transports and naming conventions
When the transport is masked / camouflaged, there would be simple mark for the group titled "Transport" or "Train transport".
If the tanks were not masked then you would see "Transport of tanks". So just one single mark for all the tanks - cargo train in this case.
The convention rules would be similar for units:
If it is column like this it could be M3 column, instead of M3. While M3 would mean M3 tanks are in formation of fighting on battle field. It could be also "M3 formation" if the were in formation.
This will make the game more clear and better arranged especially in Map view. So if you would have 20 or 40 tanks in one big column, so you will not see 20 or 40 titles, but only one mark and one title. And on a Map you will see only one dot, possibly blinking, instead of 40 dots grouped in one location. It is enough. When you have seen the enemy units from the aircraft, you need to take care on your own to find the vehicles which are on ground. I would prefer this way, other way it were too easy find the marked unit.
Truck transports
It would be nice to see truck transport solitary or commonly with other vehicles (tanks, motorcycles).
Artillery or anti tank weapons be drawn by trucks or tractors:
So for example they could hide in forest or could mask themselves like here.
Masking abilities would be great...
One more transport, two columns combined trucks & tanks.
Notice there is a lot of dust, more then in WT. The dust makes it much more harder to attack exactly. The dust also stays longer in the air. My estimation is the height of the dust cloud could be 10-12m and with is similar.
Train transports
Including loading and unloading ramps.
Uploaded tanks leaving unloading area.
Transporting of infantry
Either this way:
Or with transporters if any were in WWII.
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat